Friday, June 7, 2024

From the desk of John Brandow

I have revived this blog for the specific convenience of people who would like to follow our dream of helping our children, Grandchildren, and Great-Grandchildren to start their own businesses. I left some of my old posts ( some more than 14 years old and still relevant )
Here is the post that started all this :

 
THE GRANDPARENT’S LEGACY.
A bit of background.
I have 3 children, 9 grandchildren, and 1 great-grandchild.
My Children are doing OK as far as finances are concerned.
My eldest granddaughter has her own business whilst the Eldest Grandson is still not working
The second eldest grandson got his Matric certificate last year and the second eldest granddaughter will be matriculated this year. The others are still in school.
As grandparents, our observation is that these children will not be formally employed due to the structure of the South African economic world at the moment.
So, what is the solution?
START YOUR OWN BUSINESS – NOTHING MORE AND NOTHING LESS.
We started an initiative to help them get off the ground.
Due to my background as a retired banker and Entrepreneur for the past 24 years, I think I might just have some answers to the question: CAN ONE START A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS?
To all reading this who might find our journey helpful in their own quest for helping their own children or grandchildren, I will be posting details of our journey on this group(if they let me) and my personal Facebook page.
I am not looking to make money out of this action. Following us on this journey is not going to cost you anything. It might help you to create a legacy…..

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Finance for small businesses

No matter who you are going to approach to finance anything in your business the following will allways be the minimum any investor will want to know about the business : Yes anyone giving or lending you money is an investor in the business and in you.

1. Who are you?
2. What does your business do?
3. Is your business going to make money ?
4. Will you be able to pay them back?
5. Do you have a unique selling feature ?
6. Is your business sustainable?
7. Do you have the necessary business acumen to succeed?
8. Do you have the necessary technical expertise ?
9. Does the market like your product?
10. Is the product range sustainable ?
11. How is the investor’s money secured ?
12. Do you have a written plan ?

These are the basics and the answers are all found in number 12 : The business plan. Oh yes and you cannot answer these questions with a yes or a no. You need to explain them. And not in 200 pages. A good businessplan is rarely longer than 20 to 30 pages including the cash flow projections which should include a projected income statement and balance sheet. Asking your auditor to do this for you is probably going to cost you more than asking me to do the whole plan

Anyone can draft a business plan - Not everyone will read yours

Why ? Because they can see in your executive summary whether you know what you are doing and where you are going. It is like writing an essay: you have all the facts – you are just not presenting them in an acceptable manner. You need coaching and that is what I do.

Why would you use me ? I have a track record with financial institutions for writing plans that get funding. I have spent 35 years in banking of which around 20 was in commercial finance. I have run my own businesses succesful for the past 11 years. And I do not charge an arm and a leg.

My fees are :
1. R 8000 for the whole plan, including the cash flow projections and projected
balance sheet and income statement.
2. R 1000 for an initial interview to determine whether your project is fundable and executable. Normally we do a basic cashflow projection during this interview.
This fee is deducted from the plan fee should you require me to do the plan.

johnbrandow@p2b.co.za

Thursday, October 21, 2010

SPAM OR NOT ?

From the desk of John Brandow
Most people with an own domain might find that SPAM are on the increase. There are a lot of so called reputable businesses out there making use of SPAM creators (my definition). What is a spam creator? It is someone making it their business to harvest by any means possible email addresses and then assuring their high profiled clients (like some insurance companies - names available) that everything they do is above board. Now let me tell you it is not. How is it possible that an email purported to have been authorised by me get into my inbox addressed to an email address that is only available on my website ? An email address I never use for any other purpose as to enable clients looking for me to get in touch with me ?

Now this said there are two other major Issues I have with internet marketing companies and their strategies.

My service provider (Mweb) sends me a mail to request permission for someone I have never heard of to send me mails. Remember now they have probably send this to their whole database which is huge and when asked who this person is they do not even know. What could have happened?

Because I trust them ( they are big and looking after my interests, anyway so I thought ) I might have just said yes creating the possibility that I might be bombarded with spam I would not have had an idea where it comes from.

The second one is far more serious for me: An attempt to highjack my database. How does that work ? Under the guise of "viral marketing" i am requested to send an email on to my database with a copy to the company running a competition where you could win a weekend away. There is even a prize for the one that sends the most emails. Now I have major problems with this kind of spam creation.
1. I have build a reputable database of persons and business I know and have met or otherwise have had interaction with.
2. These people whose data is on my computer trusted me with their data and would definitely not want spammers to get hold of their data.
3. The competition runners are going to bombard them with emails using me as the reference adding credibility to their mail without that having been the intention.
4. No one knows what is going to happen to the data so collected !

Be very carefull what you send on and if you do send anything on use the blind copy facility - at least no one can misuse your data base

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Defeating Murphy’s law : Write a Partnership Agreement!

From the desk of John Brandow

Whenever you do business and there are partners involved it is absolutely crucial that a written partnership agreement are drawn up and signed by all parties concerned. This needs to be done before any vital business decisions are made and while the partners are still friends with each other. While it is not required by law, a partnership agreement can give you a framework for defining each partner's obligations, and settling the conflicts, disagreements and other difficult-to-resolve issues that naturally occur in nearly every business relationship. Ultimately, it will help ensure the long-term well-being of your business.
Starting off from the assumption that Murphy will always be present in any business venture. That is at least his laws that anything that can go wrong with the partnership will go wrong. The best intentions of a partnership will be broken when friction between the partners over the silly things in life comes into the relationship. These are things like Money, Power, (who may do what? Etc) and ego that might come into play.
It pays to be extra cautious when drafting such an agreement and it must make provision for most of the what-if situations that may arise and it must set methods for resolving these.
It is always advisable to make use of a knowledgeable attorney but it can save you money to draft the basics yourself. It is also necessary to make sure that the contract complies with local law. It is also advisable that the partners make use of independent lawyers to cover everyone’s interest and not use the company lawyer who cannot represent the interest of individual partners.
The following cover the basics that should be contained in such an agreement. There might be a few others that your lawyer might point out but it basically covers it.:
Basics
• Decide on a the name for the partnership?
• What is the purpose of the partnership?
• Is there a duration to the partnership- define it
Responsibilities, remuneration and performance
• Clarify each partner’s roles
• What are each partner's responsibilities within the company, and what level of performance is expected?
• What is each partner’s commitment in terms of time to the partnership. Is it full time, part time and to what extent will each partner do his own thing?
• How will the partners be remunerated and how will profits and losses be handled and distributed?
Contributions
• What will each partner be contributing to the partnership in terms of cash, assets, loans, investments, and/or labour?
• How will partners loan accounts be handled , what are the terms and conditions, interest rate (if applicable) and exit strategy concerning these loans?
• Should it be required might the partners be expected to make additional contributions to the partnership and how will it be handled ?
Exit strategy of partners/admission of new partners
• What guidelines should be followed if one partner wants to leave the partnership?
• (make provision for a buy and sell arrangement and cover with life insurance)
• How will possible sales of partner’s share be handled ( first refusal to other partners?) and will they be allowed to sell to outside new partners. How will such new potential partners be screened and approved by the remaining partner/s?
• Describe the route to be taken should incidences occur where a partner is guilty of misconduct, non-performance of duties etc.
• Will new partners be admitted to the partnership and the methodology in such and instance

Buy-out procedures
• What are teh guidelines should a partner want to retire or leave the partnership?
• What happens if a partner is incapacitated or dies? (buy and sell agreement)
• Will the partnership take out Buy and sell life insurance to ensure the surviving partner is able to buy the deceased partner's shares from his/her heirs?
• Will partners who leave have to sign a restriction of trade agreement?. This can be included in the first instance into the agreement.
Dispute resolution
• What methods will be used to settle disputes that can't be otherwise resolved?
• What procedures should be used in the event of a tie vote between partners on crucial partnership decisions? This is important and could be solved initially by a 49/51% shareholding split although this might complicate matters
• Will you use mediation or binding arbitration?
• If disputes can't be resolved, is there a mechanism in place for dissolving the partnership?

Financial arrangements
• What banking arrangements will be made for the partnership?
• Which partners will have cheque signing privileges?
• Who will be authorized to draw on the partnership's accounts?
• How will the books be kept?
Method for dissolving the partnership
• When can the partnership be dissolved?
• What happens to the partnership if the partners decide they can't work together?
Valuation
• What methods will be used to determine the value of the business in the event of a sale, dissolution, death, disability or withdrawal of a partner?

Thursday, July 29, 2010

The L and T factor

From the desk of John Brandow

Do you have the L and T factor ? Whatever product you are selling or whatever service you deliver or whatever fancy marketing and sales strategies you employ at the end of the day you must put these two questions to yourself : Do I have the L factor ? Do I have the T factor and does my business and my staff have it ?

Not too difficult to figure out is it ? The L factor stands for Likability factor and the T factor stands for the Trust factor. Do my clients like me and do they trust me ?

This also links up to the ethical part of your business. Do you run it in an ethical way and do your staff subscribe to the ethics of the business. Referring to the "Unashamedly ethical" campaign of the Power Construction group how many businesses will actually be willing to subscribe to the decree of the campaign? I am not here advocating or marketing the campaign. The message being that if you have the L and T factors you do not have to subscribe to anything.

If you are liked by your clients and they Trust you they will do business with you.
They like you because you are an approachable person and they Trust you because you have earned their trust and proven to them that they can trust you. Referring off course to "you" it applies to your whole business.

A recent incident with a very well known gym group (it is not Virgin - it is the other one) just emphasized my point. They cannot be Trusted and their staff are everything but likable. Why is that ? For one : They are greedy. They will try to enforce their contract to the letter, no matter what the circumstances of the client is. (even to the extend that they do not care of you call them names - Just remember that if you are happy with a business you might tell one other person but if you are not you will tell 10 others and they will tell 10 others and.........)
(I have told about a 100 how untrustworthy and unlikable I perceive them to be)

Ever thought of not signing a contract for a monthly service ? Like the Gymnasiums and Security companies.? I am prepared to bet you that you will have a path beaten to your door. Show your clients you Trust them and they can Trust you. Become a likable business.

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

From the desk of John Brandow

Buying, selling a business
Proper planning needed to set the right price
Chris Koen, Regional General Manager, Business Partners Ltd




Entrepreneurs are attached to their businesses – and that is understandable. So much effort, blood, sweat and tears are poured into starting and growing the business. That makes it very difficult to consider selling the business without attachment and emotion.

However, it is important to look at the deal (buying or selling) objectively.

A number of issues should be considered and thoroughly researched before the business is put up for sale:

* Are the financial statements up to date and of a high standard?
* Potential buyers – who would consider buying the business, what background, experience and available capital should the buyer have?
* Finding a reputable agent who can be trusted to sell the business
* What would be the role of the business's accountant in the process?
* Appointing an attorney to ensure all legal processes are complied with
* Determining the selling price – what is the value of the business, and choosing a reputable valuator

Determining a fair market value is often the most difficult issue to resolve and a professional opinion should be obtained. There are a number of methods generally used to value different types of businesses. Some of these are:

An earnings multiple - based on the premise that the value of an asset is only worth the income/cashflow streams it can produce

P/E (Price/Earnings Ratio) - quite simply, this implies the level of earnings the buyer can earn from the investment (Price to acquire the business), for example, should the NPAT (nett profit after tax) of the business be R1,0 million and a fair P/E ratio is 5, then the value of the business as a going concern would amount to R5,0 million (= R1,0 mil x 5)

EBITDA - Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization

This method is mostly used where fixed property forms a substantial part of the operating business such as a guesthouse.

For example, should the EBITDA amount to R1,0 million and a fair multiple is 7, then the value of the business as a going concern would amount to R7,0 million.

Cap rate - a capitalization rate is normally used to determine the selling price of a fixed property earning a rental income, assuming the value of the assets is determined by the cashflows it generates. For example, should the earnings before interest and tax amount to R1,0 million and a Cap rate of 11% is deemed fair, then the market value of the property would be R9 090 909 (R1.0Mil/11%)

NAV or net asset value - this method is sometimes used when a buyer would take over all the current liabilities in the business as well. (Total value of assets minus total value of liabilities)

DCF or discounted cashflow - this values the future income stream of the business. It should normally only be used when there is a fair degree of certainty of future cash being generated (for example, contracts for future delivery to reputable companies/institutions)

In summary, the buyer wants to determine if he or she will be able to generate a fair return on investment should they buy the business at a given price.

A fair return is sometimes difficult to determine, but it usually relates to the return one should be able to get on a risk free investment (like at a bank), plus a risk premium. If the purchase price of the business is for example R5,0 million, one should be able to generate a risk free return of say 10%. Can this business generate a NPBT (nett profit before tax) of R500k plus a risk premium? The risk premium is the difficult factor to determine and would depend on the type of business or industry. As a rule of thumb a risk premium in these times could probably be as high as 35%. Therefore 10% x 35% = 13.5%; and the business should then reasonably be expected to generate a NPBT of at least R675k.

Any serious buyer will do a thorough due diligence and it normally relates mostly to the financial position of the business. The seller should make sure that he or she has a good set of financial statements for at least the last three years available. These should be signed of by the accountant of the business, as well as the directors or members of the business, and should preferably not be older than three months. Any anomalies in the financial statements must be summarised and available to the buyer.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

The challenges of MLM

10 Big Myths of Multi-Level Marketing
by Robert L. FitzPatrick
The multi-level marketing (MLM) field grows and its member companies multiply.
Solicitations to join the movement seem to be everywhere. The impression accordingly
grows that it is indeed the "wave of the future", a business model that is gaining
momentum, growing in acceptance and legitimacy and, as its promoters claim, will
eventually replace most other forms of marketing and sales. Many are led to believe the
assertions that success can be found by anyone who faithfully believes in the system and
steadfastly adheres to its methods and that, eventually, all of us will become MLM
distributors.
My analysis of the MLM business is based upon fourteen years experience in corporate
consulting specifically in the distribution field and more than 12 years of research and
writing about the MLM model. This has included serving as expert witness in state and
federal court cases, speaking before national associations of state and federal
investigators, corresponding directly with more than 1,000 participants a year, writing a
book, being interviewed for local and national radio, television, newspapers and
magazines, and carefully studying numerous MLM marketing and pay plans.
This research has shown that the MLM business model, as it is practiced by most
companies, is a marketplace hoax. In those cases, the business is primarily a scheme to
continuously enroll distributors and little product is ever retailed to consumers who are not
also enrolled as distributors. The most fundamental of all of MLM's deceptions is its basic
identity. Multi-level marketing is not "direct selling." Rather, it is an investment scheme
posing as a sales business.
As a pyramid investment scheme, MLM industry claims of distributor income potential, its
descriptions of the 'network' business model and its prophecies of a reigning destiny in
product distribution have as much validity in business as UFO sightings do in the realm of
science. Financially, the odds for an individual to achieve financial success under those
circumstances rival - literally - the odds of winning at the tables in Las Vegas.
The very legality of the MLM system rests tenuously upon a single 1979 ruling on one
company. The guidelines for legality that are set forth in that ruling are routinely ignored by
the industry. Lack of governing legislation or oversight by any designated authority also
enables the industry to endure despite occasional prosecutions by state Attorneys
General or the FTC.
MLM is not defined and regulated in the way, for instance, franchising is. MLMs can be
established without federal or state approval. There is no federal law specifically against
pyramid schemes. Many state anti-pyramid statutes are vague or weak. State or federal
regulation of MLM, when it does occur, usually involves, first, proving that the company is
a pyramid scheme. This process can take years and, by then, the damage to consumers
is done. Indeed, even when MLM pyramids are shut down, often the promoters
immediately set up new companies under new names and resume scamming the public.
10 Big Myths of Multi-level Marketing
© 2009 Pyramid Scheme Alert
2
Internationally, most countries have followed the lead of the United States and allow the
same unregulated and unmonitored business practices that are prevalent among MLMs in
the US. China, the world’s largest market has banned the MLM model. This may serve as
a future model for other countries as the truth about MLM becomes better understood.
MLM's structure in which positions on an endless sales chain are purchased by selling or
buying goods is mathematically unsustainable. Its system of allowing unlimited numbers of
distributors in any market area is inherently unstable as a distribution system and
financially untenable for the distributors.
MLM's espoused core business - personal retailing - is contrary to trends in
communication technology, cost-effective distribution, and consumer buying preferences.
The retailing activity is, in reality, only a pretext for the actual core business - enrolling
investors in pyramid organizations that promise exponential income growth.
As in all pyramid schemes, the incomes of those distributors at the top and the profits to
the sponsoring corporations come from a continuous influx of new investors at the bottom
who will lose. Viewed superficially in terms of company profits and the wealth of an elite
group at the pinnacle of the MLM industry, the model can appear viable to the uninformed.
Deceptive marketing that ably plays upon treasured cultural beliefs, social and personal
needs, and some economic trends account for MLM's growth, rather than its ability to
meet any consumer needs. The deceptive marketing is nurtured by a general lack of
professional evaluation or investigation by reputable business media. Consequently, a
popular delusion is supported that MLM is a viable business investment or career choice
for nearly everyone and the odds of financial success in the venture are comparable or
better than other trades, professions, employment or business ventures.
MLM's actual economic scorecard is characterized by massive failure rates and financial
losses for millions of consumers, but these brutal financial realities are not known to most
consumers. Since MLM companies do no media advertising, few consumers are even
aware of how MLM schemes operate. The harsh lessons are learned only after being
solicited to become a "distributor."
MLM's true constituency is not the consuming public but rather hopeful investors who sign
on as the distributors or marketing agents. The market for these investors grows
significantly in times of economic transition, globalization and employee displacement.
Promises of quick and easy financial deliverance and the beguiling association of wealth
with ultimate happiness also play well in this market setting.
The marketing thrust of MLM is accordingly directed to prospective distributors, rather
than product promotions to purchasers. Its true products are not long distance phone
services, vitamin pills, fruit juices, health potions or skin lotions, but rather the investment
propositions for distributorships, which are deceptively portrayed with images of high
income, minimal time requirements, small capital investments and early success.
10 Big Myths of Multi-level Marketing
© 2009 Pyramid Scheme Alert
3
The word, myth, is provociative and it is used here for provocative purposes. In this
context, it means a cultural deception, a lie. At some level, everyone who participates in
MLM in which little retailing is occurring is unconsciously lying to himself or herself. Many
at the top of these organizations are consciously lying to everyone else. Deception is
inherent in this type of MLM scheme and is pervasive in its marketing. Here are 10 of the
biggest myths I have found to be present in almost every MLM I have encountered.
Myth #1: MLM is a business offering better opportunities for making large sums of
money than all other conventional business and professional models.
Truth: For almost everyone who invests MLM turns out to be a losing financial
proposition. This is not an opinion, but a historical fact. Consider some notable examples
from among the largest MLMs.
In the largest of all MLMs, Amway, only 1/2 of one percent of all distributors make it to the
basic level of "direct" distributor, and the average income of all Amway distributors is
about $40 a month. That is gross income before taxes and expenses. When costs are
factored, it is obvious that nearly all suffer a loss. Making it to "direct", however, is not a
ticket to profitability, but to greater losses. When the Wisconsin Attorney General filed
charges against Amway, tax returns from all distributors in the state revealed an average
net loss of $918 for that state's "direct" distributors.
Extraordinary sales and marketing obstacles account for much of this failure, but even if
the business were more feasible, sheer mathematics would severely limit the opportunity.
The MLM type of business structure can support only a small number of financial winners.
If a 1,000-person downline is needed to earn a sustainable income, those 1,000 will need
one million more to duplicate the success. How many people can realistically be enrolled?
Much of what appears as growth is in fact only the continuous churning of new enrollees.
The money for the rare winners comes from the constant enrollment of armies of losers.
The vast majority of the losers in MLM drop out within a year. In a 1999 court case
brought against Melaleuca, one of the country's larger MLMs, the company claimed it has
the highest "retention" rate among distributors in the entire MLM industry. Melaleuca
boasted a dropout rate of "only" 5.5% per month. What was unknown to many recruits was
that this figure was "month-to-month", not annual. A monthly 5.5% dropout rate equates to
about 60% per year, if the dropouts are replaced each month.
In 2001, the MLM company, Nikken, offered a statistical overview of the incomes of its
"active" distributors. This report omitted the fates of those that had dropped out and were
classified as "inactive." Yet, upon closer inspection even this slanted portrayal revealed a
devastating impact on investors. 60% of total company payout went to just 3/4th of onepercent
of the distributors. In real numbers this meant that out of each 10,000 distributors,
just 75 people - those at the very top – gained that money. The average tenure of the
"active" distributors in the lower levels – who make up 81% of the total sales force – was
less than less than $100 a year.
10 Big Myths of Multi-level Marketing
© 2009 Pyramid Scheme Alert
4
In its annual report to the SEC, Pre-Paid Legal, another large MLM, revealed that 1/2 of all
its customers and distributors quit each year and are replaced by another group of hopeful
investors. Over a five-year period, the mean average income of Pre-Paid Legal's
distributors was less than $300 per sales rep, per year, or $5.70 per week before taxes,
training and other expenses are deducted.
The pattern of 50-70% of all distributors quitting within one year holds true also for
NuSkin, the industry's second largest MLM. NuSkin also exemplifies the accompanying
pattern in which a tiny percent of the distributors gain the majority of all company rebates.
In 1998, NuSkin paid out 2/3rds of its entire rebate to just 200 upliners out of more than
63,000 "active" distributors. The money they received came directly from the investments
of the 99.7% of the others.
Myth #2: Network marketing is the most popular and effective new way to bring
products to market. Consumers like to buy products on a one-to-one basis in the
MLM model.
Truth: If you strip MLM of its hallmark activity of continuously reselling distributorships and
examine its foundation, the one-to-one retailing of products to customers, you encounter
an unproductive and impractical system of sales upon which the entire structure is
supposed to rest. Personal retailing is a thing of the past, not the wave of the future.
Retailing directly to friends on a one-to-one basis requires people to drastically change
their buying habits. They must restrict their choices, often pay more for goods, buy
inconveniently, and awkwardly engage in business transactions with close friends and
relatives. The unfeasibility of door-to-door retailing is why MLM is, in reality, a business
that just keeps reselling the opportunity to sign up more distributors.
Myth #3: Eventually all products will be sold by MLM, a new form of marketing.
Retail stores, shopping malls, catalogues and most forms of advertising will soon
be rendered obsolete by MLM.
Truth: MLM is not new. It has been around since the late 1960's. Yet, today it still
represents less than one percent of US retail sales. In year 2000, total US retail sales
were $3.232 trillion, according to the Dept. of Commerce. In that time, MLM's total sales
were about $10 billion. That is about 1/3rd of one percent to annual retail sales, and most
of this sales volume is accounted for by the purchases of hopeful new distributors who are
actually paying the price of admission to a business they will soon abandon. Not only are
MLM sales insignificant in the marketplace, but MLM fails as a sales model also on the
other key factor – maintaining customers. Most MLM customers quit buying the goods as
soon as they quit seeking the "business opportunity." There is no brand loyalty.
These basic facts show that, as a marketing model, MLM is not replacing existing forms of
marketing. It does not legitimately compete with other marketing approaches at all.
Rather, MLM represents a new investment scheme that uses the language of marketing
and sales of products. Its real products are distributorships which are sold with
misrepresentation and exaggerated promises of income. People are buying products in
10 Big Myths of Multi-level Marketing
© 2009 Pyramid Scheme Alert
5
order to secure positions on the sales pyramid. The possibility is always held out that you
may become rich if not from your own efforts then from some unknown person who might
join your 'downline,' the 'big fish' as they are called.
MLM's growth is a manifestation not of its value to the economy, customers or distributors
but of the recently high levels of economic fear and insecurity and rising expectations of
quick and easy wealth. It is growing in the same way day trading on the stock market,
legalized gambling and lotteries are.
Myth #4: MLM is a new way of life that offers happiness and fulfillment. It is a means
to attain all the good things in life.
Truth: The most prominent motivating appeal of the MLM industry as shown in industry
literature and presented at recruitment meetings is the crassest form of materialism.
Fortune 100 companies would blush at the excess of promises of wealth and luxury put
forth by MLM solicitors. These promises are presented as the ticket to personal fulfillment.
MLM's overreaching appeal to wealth and luxury conflicts with most people's true desire
for meaningful and fulfilling work in something in which they have special talent or interest.
In short, the culture of this business side tracks many people from their personal values
and desires to express their unique talents and aspirations.
Myth #5: MLM is a spiritual movement.
Truth: The use of spiritual concepts like prosperity consciousness and creative
visualization to promote MLM enrollment, the use of words like 'communion' to describe a
sales organization, and claims that MLM is a fulfillment of Christian principles or Scriptural
prophecies are great distortions of these spiritual practices. Those who focus their hopes
and dreams upon wealth as the answer to their prayers lose sight of genuine spirituality as
taught by all the great religions and faiths of humankind. The misuse of these spiritual
principles should be a signal that the investment opportunity is deceptive. When a product
is wrapped in the flag or in religion, buyer beware! The 'community' and 'support' offered
by MLM organizations to new recruits are based entirely upon their purchases. If the
purchases and enrollment decline, so does the 'communion.'
Myth #6: Success in MLM is easy. Friends and relatives are the natural prospects.
Those who love and support you will become your lifetime customers.
Truth: The commercialization of family and friendship relations or the use of 'warm leads',
which is required in the MLM marketing program, is a destructive element in the
community and very unhealthy for individuals involved. Capitalizing upon family ties and
loyalties of friendships in order to build a business can destroy ones social foundation. It
places stress on relationships that may never return to their original bases of love, loyalty
and support. Beyond its destructive social aspects, experience shows that few people
enjoy or appreciate being solicited by friends and relatives to buy products.
10 Big Myths of Multi-level Marketing
© 2009 Pyramid Scheme Alert
6
Myth #7: You can do MLM in your spare time. As a business, it offers the greatest
flexibility and personal freedom of time. A few hours a week can earn a significant
supplemental income and may grow to a very large income making other work
unnecessary.
Truth: Decades of experience involving millions of people have proven that making
money in MLM requires extraordinary time commitment as well as considerable personal
wiliness, persistence and deception. Beyond the sheer hard work and special aptitude
required, the business model inherently consumes more areas of one’s life and greater
segments of time. In MLM, everyone is a prospect. Every waking moment is a potential
time for marketing. There are no off-limit places, people or times for selling. Consequently,
there is no free space or free time once a person enrolls in MLM system.
Under the guise of creating money independently and in your free time, the system gains
control and dominance over people's entire lives and requires rigid conformity to the
program. This accounts for why so many people who become deeply involved end up
needing and relying upon MLM desperately. They alienate or abandon other sustaining
relationships.
Myth #8. MLM is a positive, supportive new business that affirms the human spirit
and personal freedom.
Truth: MLM marketing materials reveal that much of the message is fear-driven and
based upon outright deception about income potential. Solicitations frequently include dire
predictions about the impending collapse of other forms of distribution, the disintegration
or insensitivity of corporate America, and the lack of opportunity in other professions or
services. Conventional professions, trades and business are routinely demeaned and
ridiculed for not offering 'unlimited income.' Employment is cast as wage enslavement for
'losers.' MLM is presented as the last best hope for many people. This approach, in
addition to being deceptive, frequently has a discouraging effect on people who otherwise
would pursue their own unique visions of success and happiness. A sound business
opportunity does not have to base its worth on negative predictions and warnings.
Myth #9. MLM is the best option for owning your own business and attaining real
economic independence.
Truth: MLM is not self-employment. 'Owning' an MLM distributorship is an illusion. Some
MLM companies forbid distributors from carrying additional lines. Most MLM contracts
make termination of the distributorship easy and immediate for the company. Short of
termination, downlines can be taken away with a variety of means. Participation requires
rigid adherence to the 'duplication' model, not independence and individuality. MLM
distributors are not entrepreneurs but joiners in a complex hierarchical system over which
they have little control.
Myth #10: MLM is not a pyramid scheme because products are sold.
10 Big Myths of Multi-level Marketing
© 2009 Pyramid Scheme Alert
7
Truth: The sale of products is in no way a protection from anti-pyramid scheme statutes or
unfair trade practices set forth in federal and state law. MLMs that sell useful, quality
products have been successfully prosecuted under anti-pyramid scheme laws by state
and federal officials. MLM is a legal form of business only under certain rigid conditions
set forth by the FTC and state Attorneys General. Many MLMs are currently in gross
violation of these guidelines and operate only because they have not been prosecuted.
Federal regulators have used a 70% rule to determine an MLM's legality. At least 70% of
all goods sold by the MLM company must be purchased by non-distributors. This standard
would place most MLM companies outside the law. The largest of all MLMs acknowledges
that only 18% of its sales are made to non-distributors.
Robert Fitzpatrick is president of Pyramid Scheme Alert and co-author of the book, False
Profits: Seeking Financial and Spiritual Deliverance in Multi-level Marketing and Pyramid
Schemes. He is an author of numerous articles and monographs on distributor marketing
in mature industries and he has provided direct consulting services to major
manufacturers and distributors including DuPont, Fuji Film USA, Epson, and many others.
He is a featured speaker at corporate and trade association conferences in the US and
abroad. He occasionally serves as expert witness in cases brought by state Attorneys
General or by distributors against multi-level marketing companies charged with operating
as pyramid schemes. Robert Fitzpatrick can be reached at (704) 334-2047, email:
RFitzPatrick@pyramidschemealert.org, websites: http://www.pyramidschemealert.org and
http://www.falseprofits.com

Followers